To the content
3 . 2020

Clinical features and outcomes of recalcitrant ulcers in diabetic foot patients: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the proportion, clinical characteristics and outcomes of recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers in a diabetic foot department.

Material and methods. This is a retrospective cohort study of diabetic foot patients from the specialized outpatient diabetic foot clinic. The ulcer considered to be recalcitrant in case where it did not heal in 12 months using the international standards of care.

Results and discussion. Data from the 324 diabetic foot ulcers, except ulcers associated with Charcot foot, managed in out-patient diabetic foot department were analyzed. 20 (6%) ulcers were found to be recalcitrant. These wounds were mostly neuropathic (90%), with plantar localization (80%), confined to skin and subcutaneous tissue (80%). As compared with healed ulcers, there was significant difference in the number of wounds with size >1 cm2 (p<0.0001), specialized care referral (14 vs 67 days, p<0.001) and non-postoperative ulcers (p<0.0001). In 75% of cases healing of the recalcitrant ulcers was achieved after surgery [reconstructive orthopedic (65%) or plastic].

Conclusion. We found that in cohort of diabetic foot patients managed in the diabetic foot department the proportion of recalcitrant ulcers was 6%. The influence of limb ischemia, infection and depth for ulcer stagnation was not found. Late referral, non-postoperative etiology of wounds and size >1 cm2 were significantly associated with long-term non-healing status.

Keywords:diabetic foot syndrome; recalcitrant ulcers, SINBAD

Funding. The study had no sponsor support.

Conflict of interests. The authors declare no conflict of interests.

For citation: Komelyagina E.Yu., Antsiferov M.B. Clinical features and outcomes of recalcitrant ulcers in diabetic foot patients: a retrospective cohort study. Endokrinologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Endocrinology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2020; 9 (3): 21-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2304-9529-2020-9-3-21-25 (in Russian)

References

1. van Netten J.J., Bus S.A., Apelqvist J., Lipsky B.A., et al. Definitions and criteria for diabetic foot disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 (S 1): e3268.

2. Martinez-Gomez D., Moreno-Carrillo M.A., Campillo-Soto A., et al. Reduction in diabetic amputations over 15 years in a defined Spain population. Benefits of a critical pathway approach and multidisciplinary team work. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2014; 27 (3): 170–9.

3. Gunes A.E., Cimsit M. Can amputation be prevented in diabetic foot? Interdisciplinary approach to diabetic foot: a case report. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2017; 44 (2): 157–60.

4. Thewjitcharoen Y., Krittiyawong S., Porramatikul S., et al. Outcomes of hospitalized diabetic foot patients in a multi-disciplinary team setting: Thailand’s experience. J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2014; 1: 187–91.

5. Rubio J.A., Aragon-Sanchez J., Jimenez S., et al. Reducing major lower extremity amputations after the introduction of a multidisciplinary team for the diabetic foot. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2014; 13 (1): 22–6.

6. Aydin K., Islidak M., Karakaya J., Gurlek A. Change in amputation predictors in diabetic foot disease: effect of multidisciplinary approach. Endocrine 2010; 38 (1): 87–92.

7. Alvaro-Afonso F.J., Lazaro-Martinez J.L., Garcia-Alvarez Y., Papanas N. Management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers: local use of autologous leucocytes, platelats and fibrin multi-layered patches (LeucoPathc). Ann Transl Med. 2018; 6 (suppl 2): S 126.

8. Steed D.L., Attinger C., Brem H., Colaizzi T., et al. Guidelines for the prevention of diabetic ulcers. Wound Rep Reg 2008; 16: 169-74.

9. Schaper N.C., van Netten J.J., Apelqvist J. Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 (S 1): e3266.

10. Wagner F.W. The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle Clin 1981; 2: 64-122.

11. Hinchliffe R., Forsythe R., Apelqvist J., Boyko E., et al. Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020; 36 (S 1): e3276.

12. Ince P., Abbas Z.G., Lutle J.K., Basit A., Ali S.M., et al. Use of the SINBAD classification system and score in comparing outcome of foot ulcer management on three continents. Diabetes Care 2008; 31 (5): 964-7.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Ametov Alexander S.
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Subdepartment of Endocrinology, Head of the UNESCO Network Chair on the subject «Bioethics of diabetes as a global problem» of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (Moscow)
Вскрытие

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»