To the content
1 . 2024

A predictive model for assessing the risk of having different subtypes of gestational diabetes mellitus

Abstract

A number of studies have demonstrated that the formation of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) may be based on both defects in insulin secretion and decreased insulin sensitivity, and therefore various pathogenetic subtypes of GDM are distinguished: with predominant β-cell dysfunction, with predominant insulin resistance (IR) and a mixed type. Previously, it was demonstrated that different subtypes have their own characteristics: anamnestic, phenotypic, biochemical, and also differ in the risk of complications. The determination of the GDM pathogenetic subtype is not only important scientific, but also practical, especially given the projected increase in the number of such patients.

Aim. To develop a model for assessing the risk of having various subtypes of GDM in pregnant women in order to prescribe pathogenetically justified therapy timely.

Material and methods. 130 pregnant women were examined. The patients were divided according to the results of the Matsuda index, that was calculated to evaluate the IR: group 1–45 pregnant women with GDM and β-cell dysfunction, group 2–43 pregnant women with GDM and IR, group 3–42 pregnant women without GDM (control). A questionnaire, a laboratory examination [diagnosis of GDM, lipid profile test, C reactive protein (CRP), adiponectin, omentin, leptin, apolipoproteins A and B] and an assessment of objective data were conducted. The following factors were studied: body mass index (BMI) before and during pregnancy, age, history of GDM, heredity, ethnicity and blood pressure, acanthosis nigricans, life history, reproductive history, and lifestyle factors.

Results and discussion. Multiple features of various GDM subtypes have been identified, and diagnostic models have been developed. A multiple regression equation was obtained between the indicators used in the developed model: increased values of the indicators «Weight», «Glucose 0», «Glucose 120», «CRP» increase the probability of having a subtype of GDM with pronounced IR [the area under the curve (AUC) is 98.79%, which indicates an extremely high predictive power of the model (the sensitivity of the model is 90%, the specificity is 98.28%)].

Conclusion. A mathematical model has been developed to identify GDM subtypes, which has an extremely high predictive power (98.79%) and meets the requirements for screening models.

Keywords:gestational diabetes mellitus; insulin resistance; pancreatic β-cell dysfunction; subtypes of gestational diabetes mellitus; diagnostic model

Funding. Completed within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (topic No. 21052700088-0 dated May 27, 2021).

Conflict of interest. The authors declare no obvious or potential conflicts of interests related to the publication of this article.

For citation: Volkova N.I., Davidenko I. Yu., Sorokina Yu.A., Degtyareva Yu.S., Vlasova N.D., Baeva D.O. A predictive model for assessing the risk of having different subtypes of gestational diabetes mellitus. Endokrinologiya: novosti, mneniya, obuchenie [Endocrinology: News, Opinions, Training]. 2024; 13 (1): 27–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/2304-9529-2024-13-1-27-34 (in Russian)

References

1. Care and Prevention. 2021. Gestational Diabetes [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.idf.org/our-activities/care-prevention/gdm (date of access August 20, 2021).

2. Uptodate.com. 2021. UpToDate. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gestational-diabetes-mellitus-obstetric-issues-andmanagement (date of access August 20, 2021).

3. Ye W., Luo C., Huang J., Li C., Liu Z., Liu F. Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and metа-analysis. BMJ. 2022; 377: e067946 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-067946

4. Volkova N.I., Davidenko I. Yu., Degtyareva Yu.S. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya [Obstetrics and Gynecology]. 2021; (9): 174–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2021.9.174-179 (in Russian)

5. Powe C., Allard C., Battista M., Doyon M., Bouchard L., Ecker J., et al. Heterogeneous contribution of insulin sensitivity and secretion defects to gestational diabetes mellitus. Table 1. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39 (6): 1052–5.

6. Liu Y., Hou W., Meng X., Zhao W., Pan J., Tang J., et al. Heterogeneity of insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study of perinatal outcomes. J Transl Med. 2018; 16 (1): 289.

7. Feghali M., Atlass J., Ribar E., Caritis S., Simhan H., Scifres C. 82: Subtypes of gestational diabetes mellitus based on mechanisms of hyperglycemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220 (1): S 66.

8. Benhalima K., Van Crombrugge P., Moyson C., Verhaeghe J., Vandeginste S., Verlaenen H., et al. Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes across gestational diabetes mellitus subtypes based on insulin resistance. Diabetologia. 2019; 62 (11): 2118–28.

9. Gastaldelli A. Measuring and estimating insulin resistance in clinical and research settings. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022; 30 (8): 1549–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23503 PMID: 35894085; PMCID: PMC 9542105.

10. Reaven G.M. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988; 37: 1595–607.

11. Clausen J.O., Bergman R.N., Hougaard P., Pedersen O., et al. Insulin sensitivity index, acute insulin response, and glucose effectiveness in a population-based sample of 380 young healthy Caucasians. Analysis of the impact of gender, body fat, physical fitness, and life-style factors. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98 (5): 1195–209.

12. Del Prato S., Leonetti F., Matsuda M., DeFronzo R.A., et al. Effect of sustained physiologic hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycaemia on insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity in man. Diabetologia. 1994; 37: 1025–35.

13. Stern S.E., Williams K., Ferrannini E., DeFronzo R.A., Bogardus C., Stern M.P. Identification of individuals with insulin resistance using routine clinical measurements. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 333–9.

14. Tam C.S., Xie W., Johnson W.D., Cefalu W.T., Redman L.M., Ravussin E. Defining insulin resistance from hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps. Diabetes Care. 2012; 35: 1605–10.

15. Isokuortti E., Zhou Y., Peltonen M., et al. Use of HOMA-IR to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based and inter-laboratory study. Diabetologia. 2017; 60: 1873–82.

16. Gayoso-Diz P., Otero-González A., Rodriguez-Alvarez M.X., et al. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) cut-off values and the metabolic syndrome in a general adult population: effect of gender and age: EPIRCE cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2013; 13: 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-13-47

17. Yun K.J., Han K., Kim M.K., et al. Insulin resistance distribution and cut-off value in Koreans from the 2008–2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0154593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154593

18. Otten J., Ahren B., Olsson T. Surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity vs the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2014; 57: 1781–8.

19. Stumvoll M., Mitrakou A., Pimenta W., et al. Use of the oral glucose tolerance test to assess insulin release and insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 295–301.

20. McIntyre H., Catalano P., Zhang C., Desoye G., Mathiesen E., Damm P. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019; 5 (1): 47.

All articles in our journal are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0 license)

CHIEF EDITOR
CHIEF EDITOR
Ametov Alexander S.
Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Subdepartment of Endocrinology, Head of the UNESCO Network Chair on the subject «Bioethics of diabetes as a global problem» of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (Moscow)
Вскрытие

Journals of «GEOTAR-Media»